Jun 08 2006

Get. A. Grip.

Published by rightwingprof at 11:04 am under Conservatism, GWOT

I expect Letterman to bash Ann Coulter. However, what’s really disgusting is that practically every right-wing blogger has jumped on the “Ann Coulter was out of line” train.

Does this remind you of the equally disgusting “I won’t criticize her, and you shouldn’t either” reaction to Cindy Sheehan when she first started spitting on her son’s service to further her personal agenda? It should. The women to whom Ann referred are doing exactly the same thing as Sheehan, and deserve the same scorn.

And all you bloggers who are expressing your self-righteous anger at Ann need to be smacked. Hard.

STFU. Ann is right. You’re wrong. And at least Misha agrees with me.

18 responses so far

18 Responses to “Get. A. Grip.”

  1. Pamon 08 Jun 2006 at 11:51 am

    I have to say that I agree with you. Using the death of loved ones for political purposes is one of the slimiest things one can do. The howling of these women has drowned out anything the families of other victims might have to say. They seem to forget who was to blame for their husbands’ deaths: not George Bush, not our government, but AL-QAEDA TERRORISTS! Ann’s commentary may seem harsh, but she is right on the money. (My husband and I usually agree about these things, but this time he feels she is out of line…)

  2. Darrenon 08 Jun 2006 at 12:20 pm

    I agree.

  3. U.R.N. Eedihotton 08 Jun 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Jesus, even Bill O’Reilly has condemned The Bitch’s statements, and still she finds ample idiotic defenders on the right, none of whom seem to be able to make the simple distinction (that a few sane conservatives are able to see) that even IF she has a valid point, there’s simply no excuse for the WAY she said it. It’s so obviously reprehensible that to explain to you idiots why it’s offensive would be pointless. The numerous wingnut bloggers defending her and the vitriolic comments on the rightie blogs that condemned her prove that for many wingnuts, there is simply no line that shouldn’t be crossed as long as it promotes their own political ideals. Maybe you, Coulter, and Malkin could start a new political party and get Fred Phelps to be your presidential nominee- now there’s a guy who’s not afraid to slay sacred cows to get his point across.

  4. rightwingprofon 08 Jun 2006 at 2:02 pm

    There’s no reason to argue with moonbats. Just let them spew, and they hang themselves.

  5. Darrenon 08 Jun 2006 at 2:03 pm

    U.R.N. Eedihott on June 8, 2006 at 1:06 pm said:

    Jesus, even Bill O’Reilly has condemned The Bitch’s statements, and still she finds ample idiotic defenders on the right, none of whom seem to be able to make the simple distinction (that a few sane conservatives are able to see) that even IF she has a valid point, there’s simply no excuse for the WAY she said it. It’s so obviously reprehensible that to explain to you idiots why it’s offensive would be pointless.

    That’s a lot of name-calling in such a short time. Not very intellectually convincing.

  6. U.R.N. Eedihotton 08 Jun 2006 at 2:13 pm

    Name calling is bad and unintelligent? You do, uhm, actually read Ann Coulter don’t you? Or are you really just that obtuse?

    Maybe it’s just the names I used. Maybe if I called people the things Coulter does, like widows “witches” and Muslims “ragheads”, you’d find my comments more “intellectually convincing”.

    Watch as Little Miss Coulter leads all her faithful sheep over a cliff into an abyss of intellectual and moral bankruptcy. Baa! Baa!

  7. Jeffrey Quickon 08 Jun 2006 at 2:53 pm

    I’m not much for Coulter’s style, in general. She’s sort of the Maureen Down of the Right: more flash than substance. But yes, these widows are using their husband’s deaths to give meaning to their lives. Is that wrong? Maybe not. But I don’t see how having had intercourse with somebody who was in the wrong place at the wrong time suddenly gives you extra moral standing or insight to criticise the government.

  8. Lucien de la Pesteon 08 Jun 2006 at 3:45 pm

    To quote Keith Olberman….

    Appearing in Playboy and getting divorced ….neither of those being scenarios Ann Coulter is ever going to have to deal with in her life.

  9. rightwingprofon 08 Jun 2006 at 3:53 pm

    To quote Keith Olberman….

    And why would you want to quote an anti-American wackjob like Olberman?

  10. Lucien de la Pesteon 08 Jun 2006 at 4:55 pm

    Because it was funny?

    Strange she never married.

  11. John Smithon 09 Jun 2006 at 12:18 am

    She never married because, quoting Austin Powers “She’s a man, man!” Look at her “adams apple” next time you see on TV and see what I mean. If she turns out to be a tranny, no doubt every right wing nut job will still maintain their secret crush on her/him.

  12. rightwingprofon 09 Jun 2006 at 7:41 am

    John Smith on June 9, 2006 at 12:18 am said:

    She never married because, quoting Austin Powers “She’s a man, man!” Look at her “adams apple” next time you see on TV and see what I mean. If she turns out to be a tranny, no doubt every right wing nut job will still maintain their secret crush on her/him.

    Thanks for sharing your sexual fantasies. Try not to do it here.

    Where’s my Zantac …

  13. Jeffrey Quickon 09 Jun 2006 at 8:13 am

    Tranny or not, I have never understood the claim that Coulter was “hot”. She’s just never appealed to me in that way. Different strokes I guess.

    And I hope y’all figured out that my fingers were brain-dead above, and I meant Maureen DOWD.

  14. Jeffrey Quickon 09 Jun 2006 at 10:09 am

    And here McCullough gets it: the Jersey Girls as human shields.

  15. dragonlady474on 09 Jun 2006 at 2:19 pm

    Anyone who takes a tragedy, especially a personal one and turns it into an attention getting scheme for their own agenda is a flake, to put it nicely.

  16. U.R.N. Eedihotton 09 Jun 2006 at 9:07 pm

    Yeah, nobody on the right has ever used the tragedy of 9/11 to push their own agenda. Bush certainly has never used 9/11 to push his own agenda, just like he never linked Sadam and Al-Qaeda again and again in his push for HIS war.

  17. john smithon 10 Jun 2006 at 12:29 pm

    Wouldn’t be hilarious if one of the Jersey Girls with Mob ties had Coulter “taken out” a la Tony Soprano? Now that would be funny. Just ask Jimmy Hoffa wherever you are?

  18. romion 13 Jun 2006 at 4:47 pm

    ann the great! love her style.

  • Recent Comments

    • Rich Horton: Farewell, and God bless Professor.
    • Curmudgeon: Good Night, Professor.
    • jimmyb: Rest in peace, Prof.
    • Glenn B: I don’t know where I have been lately, maybe my head was up my toosh. I have not been keeping up with...
    • Bitter American: From Wyatt Earp’s blog: sending you all my good thoughts every day.
  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Calendar

    June 2006
    S M T W T F S
    « May   Jul »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
  • Archives

  • A Few Friends

  • A-List

  • Absolutely Essential

  • Activism

  • American Liberty

  • Buy Red

  • Columnists

  • Greylist

  • Military Blogs

  • Moral - Ethik - Kirche

  • News and Commentary

  • Research

  • Right Wing Blogs

  • RKABA and Firearms

  • Sane Muslims

  • Support the Troops

  • Talk Radio

  • Unapologetically Humorous

  • University Sites

  • Warzone Blogs

  • Meta

  • Stats 'n Stuff







  • Anglosphere Consortium