Right Wing Nation
Senator McCain has not spent decades aiding and abetting people who hate America. - Thomas Sowell

Right Wing Nation

Oblivion

October 31st, 2006 at 6:53 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

I’m trying to imagine the meeting of journalists here. Bear with me.

“We’ve got a problem. Our circulations have been dropping as fast as our stocks. What should we do to get back readers?”

“I know! I know!”

“What?”

“We’ll do a news special about what ignorant, in-bred, bigoted morons conservatives are!”

“That’s a great idea!”

Remember back in April when NBC thought they would send Muslims to NASCAR races and film what intolerant rednecks NASCAR fans were?

Well, they’re at it again, except this time, it’s CBS (hat tip Ace):

Do you get nervous when you see a Muslim on an airplane? Have your opinions about Muslims changed since September 11? Do you have family or friends that get nervous around Muslims?

A NEW CBS SHOW SEEKS New York families who have traditional family values but are uneasy around Muslims.

Tell me again how intelligent these journalists are, that they think the way to reverse their declining sales it to bash Americans.


Dinner Tonight

October 31st, 2006 at 4:36 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

We moved from a house about ten miles out of town in the country in Indiana. You know, no neighbors really, just the people who live down the road. Needless to say, no trick-or-treaters.

We now live up on a mountain ridge, in the “furthest out” neighborhood. It’s far from huge. The exurbs, I think you’d call it. Not tons of people. But last Halloween, we got hundreds of trick-or-treaters, and ran out of candy in under an hour and had to go get some more.

This year, we hit Sam’s Club for huge bags of candy (and yes, Mr. Miller, we got Tootsie Rolls). But dinner tonight is going to be a double quarter pounder with cheese and fries from MickeyD’s, so we can eat and run back and forth to the front door.

I HEART double quarter pounders with cheese …


Why Wait A Week

October 31st, 2006 at 4:10 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

When you can go off the deep end looney-tunes now? DU: GOD DAMN THEM ALL: THEY ARE STEALING IT NOW! And of course there’s all the predictable nonsense about Diebold, electronic voting machines, etc., like this:

The problem is, voting machines make it possible to fraud an entire election.

Problem is, some conservatives are jumping on the “evil electronic voting machines” bandwagon. And the thing that has never made any sense about it is that boxes of paper ballots have mysteriously “appeared” in election after election (remember when Dino Rossi was ahead of Christine Gregoire in the Washington gubernatorial race until Christine Gregoire’s staff suddenly “found” those boxes of ballots sitting in a closet?) What good is a paper trail — given the ease with which politicians “find” ballots in the most fascinating places?

Folks, take your meds. All of you.


Dear Kerry:

October 31st, 2006 at 3:21 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Do your homework before you open your stupid mouth (and if you have no idea what this is about, read this).

Educational Level 2004 General Population 2004 Recruits
High School Grad
79.8%
96.78%

And Democrats couldn’t figure out why military and veterans didn’t support him? What kind of drugs are these people on?

Source.


I’m Speechless

October 31st, 2006 at 1:42 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Political correctness, as much as fundamentalism, is responsible for our state of absurdity, writes Umberto Eco. Hat tip to Andrew Bolt.


Sometimes All You Can Say Is

October 31st, 2006 at 12:54 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Give me a break. Like here. Or here.

Some people badly need to get a life.


Oh Liiiiiberals …

October 31st, 2006 at 12:31 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

You’d think they’d be all over this (hat tip to Pennsylvanian in Exile):

A former army officer from El Salvador who was convicted of taking part in the 1989 massacre of six Jesuit priests and two other people during that country’s civil war was arrested in the United States and faces deportation, authorities said Wednesday.

The killings sparked international outrage and tarnished the image of U.S. anti-Communism efforts in the region after it was found that some of the soldiers involved had received training at the former School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Ga.

Federal agents acting on a tip arrested Gonzalo Guevara Cerritos, 43, on Oct. 18 at a motel near the University of California, Los Angeles. He illegally entered the country in January 2005, according to a statement from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

That chirping you hear is the sound of liberals screaming for him to be deported.


Another “Study” Bites The Dust

October 31st, 2006 at 12:17 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

The Stern Report: Cherry Picking on Disasters and Climate Change


Reason #4032 To Nuke California

October 31st, 2006 at 8:09 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Ali Bubba has this rather disturbing news item from Alabama:

Albertville, Ala. — Police say a Marshall County teen raped his mother to get revenge on his brother.

Police say 19-year-old Gary Helms, Jr., raped his 45-year-old mother this past weekend at Willow Terrace Trailer Park on Doyle Drive in Albertville. …

“From what we understand the rape stemmed from an argument between him and his brother. And apparently they were arguing over a girlfriend. And the rape was some sort of retaliation towards his brother,” said Sgt. Jamie Smith of the Albertville Police Department. ….

Authorities say Helms’ mother was apparently passed out drunk on the couch when the rape started.

And of course you’re wondering what this has to do with California. It’s the revenge motif. You all know I’m addicted to forensics shows, and the other day on one of them (New Detectives, I believe, one of the documentary shows, not a fiction show) there was an episode that really burned my ass.

We had a divorced woman with a toddler (just under two, IIRC) who was living with her boyfriend. Boyfriend got super pissed off because Divorced Woman spent Boyfriend’s birthday with her ex-husband (they never did explain where Boyfriend was on his birthday, or why he wasn’t with her).

So what did he do about it?

On Divorced Woman’s birthday, he decided to get revenge by murdering her toddler. That’s right. Not her. Her little boy. Boyfriend tried to drown the toddler, and when that didn’t work, he strangled him by shoving a cigarette wrapper down his throat.

Planned. Deliberate. Clear case of First Degree Murder. Of a little boy. To get revenge on the boy’s mother for spending time with her ex-husband. As clear a death penalty case as you can get.

So what did he get?

Twenty-five to life. For the planned, deliberate, murder of a helpless child, just to get revenge on the mother. And of course the difference between Alabama and California is that this sicko who raped his mother will get the book thrown at him, while California slaps this murderer on the wrist.

Oh, and of course, this was in California. So tell me, is there some reason we haven’t nuked California off the map?


Halloween Free Thread

October 31st, 2006 at 8:01 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Technorati:

Comment or trackback, as long as you link to this post.

Trackback URI:
http://rightwingnation.com/2006/10/31/halloween-free-thread/trackback/

Previous free threads are here.


USA: Conservative Nation

October 30th, 2006 at 1:24 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

We looked at the Battleground Polls for last year and this year (you remember: 61% of the respondents called themselves conservative, while 35% of the respondents called themselves liberal). Well, there’s further confirmation that the USA is not a nation of Cindy Sheehans and Alec Baldwins, and from CNN no less (hat tip to Club for Growth Blog):

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A quarter century after the Reagan revolution and a dozen years after Republicans vaulted into control of Congress, a new CNN poll finds most Americans still agree with the bedrock conservative premise that, as the Gipper put it, “government is not the answer to our problems — government is the problem.”

[ . . . ]

Queried about their views on the role of government, 54 percent of the 1,013 adults polled said they thought it was trying to do too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses. Only 37 percent said they thought the government should do more to solve the country’s problems.

Americans had a slightly different perspective when it came to the specific issue of promoting traditional values. A slight majority — 51 percent — said they thought that was an appropriate activity for government, while 43 percent said it should not favor any particular set of values.

The sampling error for the questions in the poll, conducted for CNN by Opinion Research Corporation, was plus or minus 3 percentage points.

You know those CNN moonbats are mystified.


Weighted House Scores

October 30th, 2006 at 12:37 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Some time ago, I calculated the mean GOA scores for several states, but as much of a pain in the ass as it was, and as little time as I had, I didn’t do them all. AlphaPatriot picked up the slack, and calculated the means for all the states (fortunately, he made the Excel file available for download, or I wouldn’t have done this).

The problem with these means was that the scores were for House members. Had they been for senators, a mean score for each state would have been logical, since each state has two senators. But states have different numbers of representatives based on their populations, so that Wyoming may have gotten the highest mean, but Wyoming has only one House seat.

Inspired by Will’s Net Ideology analysis, I downloaded AlphaPatriot’s data, and calculated a GOA score sum for each state (though I have far less patience with playing with graphics than Will, so my chart isn’t nearly as fancy). When I calculated the means the first time around, out of habit I “leveled” the A+ (because an A+ is a 4.0, just like an A). This time, I calculated an A+ as a 4.3 on the scale. The GOA also gives an F- grade, so I used -0.3 for the GPA equivalent.

The advantage of a weighted score for the House is that it reflects the contribution of each state toward protecting the Second Amendment in the House of Representatives. The chart is rather tall, since there are fifty states.


Monday Free Thread

October 30th, 2006 at 6:53 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Technorati:

Comment or trackback, as long as you link to

Previous free threads are here.


Moonbat Watch

October 29th, 2006 at 2:02 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Today’s example of “peace, love, freedom, happiness, pass the bong!” nuttiness comes from Euphoric Reality:

Cindy Sheehan was in Fresno today with her message of “peace.” Meanwhile, her supporters were outside screaming that Marines “Kill, rape and sodomize children.”

In other examples of “peace and love” idiots who hate the military, here’s one spewing her crap at O’Reilly on Oprah (video), and here’s the California variety of moonbat heckling a dead soldier’s mother (I guess you only get “moral authority” from liberals if you hate the United States).


That Time Of Year

October 29th, 2006 at 1:50 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

So now that you’ve made that homemade beef stock, what are you going to do with it?

Beef stew, of course!

This is a basic recipe. Feel free to substitute red wine or even beer for part of the stock, though to keep it beef stew, at least half the liquid should be beef stock. Some like turnips in their stew — I abhor turnips and rutabagas — and if you’re one of them, peel a few and toss them in.

Beef Stew

2 lb. stew beef (if you want to get ripped off) or chuck, cut into one-inch cubes
1/2 c. flour
1 T. black pepper, ground
2 T. oil

potatoes, cubed
carrots, cubed

3 c. beef stock, plus more as it cooks
2 bay leaves

Mix the flour and pepper (note that there’s no salt — this is another dish you don’t want to salt until it’s done) in a paper or plastic bag. Add beef, about 1/2 lb. at a time, and shake. Heat oil over high heat, and brown the beef cubes. As they brown, put them into a large heavy-bottomed pot. Repeat until all the beef is browned.

Add bay leaves, vegetables, and stock. Bring to a boil, then cover tightly and simmer. Every half hour or so, stir, and if it needs more stock, add some, about a half cup at a time. Simmer slowly for about two hours, until the beef is tender and the flavors are blended. Salt to taste when done.


Halloween Classic Films

October 29th, 2006 at 1:28 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

It’s 44 and spitting snow here. How? I have no idea.

1931 was a great year for films — particularly spooky films. And three stand out as classics. Two have been remade, but no remake has touched the original; the third has never been remade (perhaps because it’s a German film), which of course is …

Fritz Lang’s M, a haunting Expressionist masterpiece, with Peter Lorre in his greatest role as the child murderer. This film is in so many ways so much more terrifying than the shock horror films that have come out since the 70s, with no violent scenes (we never see Lorre murder a child; the murder is implied). In true Fritz Lang tradition, every frame of this film is beautiful to see, and when Lorre is in the scene, you can’t look away from him. A stunning film.

Next up is, of course, Dracula, Todd Browning’s Expressionism-influenced masterpiece, with Bela Lugosi giving an astounding performance as the Count. Dracula, like M, is also a visually stunning film, and Browning uses the camera — not gore — to display the tension between horror and erotica. Rarely do you see the whole film, unless you own your own copy. Sometimes, the Renfield section from the beginning is cut; sometimes, the Harker section from Transylvania is cut. This film has been remade many times, and while some of the remakes have had their own positive qualities — I’m thinking of the 79 Langella Dracula, and not the vile Coppola film — none can compete with the Browning film.

Then there is James Whale’s classic Frankenstein. Unlike the other two films, Frankenstein is a great film almost exclusively because of Boris Karloff’s performance. Frankenstein has never been successfully remade, because only in the original do we see the “monster” portrayed with such sensitivity. Karloff’s “monster” is childlike, and without uttering a word, he makes us sympathize with his character. Every other Frankenstein made is garbage.

1931. It was a great year for horror films.


That Liberal Elitism

October 29th, 2006 at 12:58 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

I just got this in the mail from Newsmax:

When it comes to same-sex marriage, Sen. Hillary Clinton has had a change of heart.

The New York senator told a recent gathering of gay and lesbian activists in Manhattan that she won’t oppose efforts to enact a same-sex marriage law in the state if Eliot Sptizer, the odds-on favorite to become the next governor, wants it enacted into law.

This is precisely the problem with not just this issue, but abortion and others as well. If Spitzer wants it enacted into law? What is Spitzer, the King of New York? What about the citizens of New York — you know, the voters? Will Spitzer stoop to asking them, or will he just wave his magic wand and enact it?


Daylight Savings Ends Today

October 29th, 2006 at 8:23 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Don’t forget to set your clocks back an hour today!


That Liberal Logic!

October 28th, 2006 at 4:45 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

From Jay Tea:

In Massachusetts, the race is on to succeed outgoing governor Mitt Romney(R). His Lieutenant Governor, Kerry Murphy Healey, has made sex crimes and sex offenders one of her pet causes. She pushed through a new, tougher law on sex offenders, and has made several other moves that improve the lot of women in the Bay State.

Her opponent, Deval Patrick, is a lawyer. He spent several years trying to win parole for a vicious rapist, even contributing $5,000 out of his own pocket to help the scumbag win an appeal. When the DNA test Patrick helped pay for came back positive, Patrick finally stopped trying to win the freedom of the man he had described as “thoughtful” and “humane” — the man who had tied up and repeatedly raped a 58-year-old neighbor over a 12-hour period. Patrick is also in favor of making it easier for convicted felons to expunge their records.

So, naturally, several Massachusetts women’s groups have endorsed Patrick.

Naturally. Just as the feminuts suddenly shut up about female circumcision after 9/11.

Feminonsense: It’s what’s for dinner.


PC Conservatism

October 28th, 2006 at 9:57 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve noticed the bloggers in the dextrosphere writing self-righteously about being “offended” or “inappropriate content” every time Ann Coulter comes out with a column. Or more recently, when these bloggers got their information from the media instead of the transcript and (sorry, can’t help myself) rushed to condemn Rush for criticizing Fox on that ad. Or there was the “macaca” fiasco, which these same self-righteous bloggers condemned — even though they had never heard of “macaca” in their lives, but were just sure it had to be some kind of racist slur because that’s what the leftist talking heads were saying.

The latest example is the Allen ad about Webb’s books. Ace says:

Let me get this straight: We’re determined to win this war. We’re willing to harshly coerce terrorists to get vital information, and commit 150,000+ (maybe more) of our boys to Battlefield Iraq to win it.

However, we’re above using the left’s tactics against them to defeat a war opponent who will work to undermine our efforts if he’s elected?

That’s where we stand?

When did that memo get circulated?1

I’d second that, except it’s not really an issue of being above the liberals in terms of tactics. It’s worse than that. We have allowed the liberals to control the rules of dialogue for so long now that we’ve bought into this “never offend!” “be sensitive to the disadvantaged!” “avoid the appearance of racism at all costs, even if it’s unfounded!” idiocy.

The Anchoress. Captain Ed. Patterico. Rick Moran. All of them have bought into this PC nonsense, and every time they display it, I grit my teeth — or close the browser and move on. Even the candidates have bought into it. Look at how fast Allen apologized for the “macaca” incident, even though it was crap for the beginning.

Stop. Apologizing. Now.

Sensitivity is crap. Being afraid of offending somebody is crap. And retreating and apologizing every time some liberal screams “racist!” is crap. Not crap as in bullsh*t, but crap as in self-destructive, stupid bullshi*t.

This started with the Willie Horton fiasco, which was a fiasco because there was nothing racist about that ad. Nothing. Racist. About. It. At. All. But the ad never ran again, and Bush.41 and nearly every Republican in Congress stood up to decry it.

What utter crap that was. And look where it’s brought us. We’re a bunch of pussified weenies who are so scared of being seen as “racists” or “whateverists” and so very concerned about not offending anybody and being sensitive we even condemn politicians we support and would rather see them be “sensitive” than win an election.

Both the Anchoress and Captain Ed are wringing their hands over the nastiness of the elections. Fine. Wet your pants and moan about it after we’ve won, but shut up until after the elections so we can win. I’m sorry these people have bought into this PC crap, but I’m really sick of them sabotaging us just so they can feel good about not offending anybody.

Extremely sick of it, in fact.

  1. Ace is primarily responding to Michelle Malkin’s objection to the Allen ad, though to be fair, she objects for an entirely different reason, because she says it’s irrelevant to the campaign, which I can sympathize with. []

Stock Basics

October 28th, 2006 at 9:13 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Let’s talk stock.

I’m amazed by how few people I know make homemade stock, particularly when it’s so simple, and when the difference in quality between homemade and store bought is so … well, I can’t think of a word that adequately describes the scope of that difference.

Sorry, but no, that canned chicken broth is not an acceptable substitute, at least not in any recipe where stock is a major ingredient. And that “free range, organic” broth in the carton is no better. (Having said that, if you must go with store bought, Kitchen Basics stock is by far the best available.)

And there’s no good excuse for not having homemade on hand, as easy as it is to make, but people know very little about how to make it. So after I get the myths and misconceptions out of the way, I’ll tell you how to make amazing chicken and beef stock.

Chicken stock

The biggest misconception people have about chicken stock is that the flavor comes from the chicken meat. It does not. Chicken meat is bland, and you cannot use it to make stock. Try putting a couple of those foul boneless, skinless breasts in a pan, covering them with water, and simmering them for, oh, give it as much time as you have, say a couple of hours. After you remove the inedibly dry breasts, taste the liquid.

Nearly flavorless.

Now try the same experiment with regular breasts (you know, the kind with the bone and skin). Note that the liquid is full of flavor.

Bones, skin, and fat are the ingredients that give stock its richness and flavor — not chicken meat. Bones lend not only flavor, but gelatin, which gives stock that wonderful richness (and makes it gel when refrigerated).

The very best stock is made from the carcass left after you have roasted a chicken (or capon, or even a turkey), much better than just tossing a few chicken pieces (with bone and skin, of course) into a pot with some water, because roasting brings out the flavor in the bones and carmelizes the skin and gives the stock that yellow color. If you don’t want to roast a chicken, pick up a couple of those roast chickens at the store (in my experience, they’re far too done and dry, but they’re good for stock), carve the meat off and eat, then put the carcasses in a large stockpot with as much of the skin as you managed to reserve.

I can hear you now. Yes, technically you can use a crock pot, but you need one large enough (I have a Cuisinart slow cooker that’s quite big) and the standard Crock Pots are not close to large enough, and as an aside, I think Crock Pots give stock an odd, almost overcooked flavor. Stock pots are cheap because they don’t have to be heavy. Pick up a couple at your local kitchen store.

Heat your oven to 500, spray a baking pan with Pam, and toss in a couple of onions halved, a few stalks of celery, and a few carrots (you don’t have to peel or trim any of these, by the way). Roast them for about a half hour, until they’re nice and brown. Remove the veggies, peel and all, to the stockpot, then deglaze the pan with some water over high heat, and add it to the pot.

Add water, about two inches above the carcasses. Bring to a boil, then lower to a very slow simmer, cover tightly, and let it go for several hours. Check it every hour or so and keep the level of the water about two inches above the carcasses. I’d cook it about eight hours. You can tell when you’ve got a nice, rich, stock by looking at it; you should have a nice, dark yellow, fatty stock. If not, keep cooking it.

If you don’t want to buy those roasted chickens at the store, you can buy a bunch of necks and backs, or even wings, at the store, and roast them along with the veggies (then proceed as above).

Bones, fat, and skin. Bones, fat, and skin. Bones, fat, and skin.

Strain the stock. If you want, you can degrease it now, but I never do. The reason I don’t is because when you refrigerate it, not only will the stock gel, but the fat will rise to the top and solidify, effectively sealing it. What I do when I want to use part of it is take it out of the refrigerator, then remove the fat from the top (it’s very easy to do this) and reserve it. I then nuke the stock until it’s liquified so I can measure out what I need, then add the fat back in and nuke it until it’s melted and the whole container is liquified and very hot. I then put it back in the refrigerator, and the fat always rises to the top, solidifies, and seals it.

Bones, fat, and skin. Bones, fat, and skin. Bones, fat, and skin.

Beef stock

The primary difference between making chicken and beef stock is that unlike chicken meat, beef is not bland. Bones, fat, and meat, with meat being the least important of the three, give you a rich, flavorful beef stock.

I start by buying soup bones, though these days, they’re too clean all by themselves to give you a great beef stock. I buy a bunch of oxtails, because they contain lots of great, sawed bones, fat, and beef. If oxtails aren’t available, short ribs are a good substitute (though a bit expensive). Or buy a nice big piece of chuck — lots of flavor and that absolutely necessary fat — and use it (and if you’re afraid of fat, there’s no reason to be. The flavor provided by fat is water soluble, so even after you degrease and use it, you get the flavor. But to make a good stock, you must have fat.)

Again, preheat the oven to 500, and spray a large baking pan with Pam. Put all the bones and oxtails in the pan, then a couple of onions, halved (again, no need to peel the veggies), carrots and celery. Roast until quite dark brown (this is what gives color to your stock, and brings out flavors), then pour the contents of the pan into a large stockpot. Deglaze the pan with some water, and add it to the stockpot. Cover with water, again about two inches, cover tightly, and cook at a very gentle simmer for several hours (eight is always good for stock). Strain and store as directed above.

Final comments

If you don’t roast long enough at the beginning, or in the case of beef stock, you don’t use enough oxtails, you will end up with a pale stock (this is more likely with beef stock). Add just a couple of tablespoons of dark soy sauce — you won’t taste it, but it will give the stock a rich brown color.

Note that I did not give any directions about salt and pepper. This is because you should not season with salt and pepper — especially salt — until the stock has been strained, especially with chicken stock, which will be saltier on its own than beef stock (in fact, you’ll be shocked at how “bland” the beef stock tastes until you salt it).

The next time you make soup — and it’s getting to be that time of year — instead of using store bought, use homemade stock. Relish the difference!

And what to do with that stock? Here’s a suggestion.


Anybody Else Watching Dexter?

October 28th, 2006 at 7:48 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

That new show on Showtime?

It’s an … well, it’s an intriguing concept. Dexter, the main character, was adopted as a kid by a policeman’s family. Something (we don’t know what yet) violent had happened in Dexter’s original home, and his policeman father saw that Dexter was a serial-killer-to-be. So policeman father taught Dexter how to cover his tracks so he wouldn’t get caught, and encouraged him to channel his “talent” into killing criminals who had escaped prosecution.

Yes, I know, unlikely. But interesting.

Now, Dexter is a forensic scientist on the police force (his adopted sister is a cop, and she’s useless and needs to die), and he moonlights as a serial killer — killing murderers who have escaped prosecution. There’s a serial killer who apparently knows all about Dexter, and is playing a game with him, sort of “Catch and kill me before I catch and kill you.”

Unlikely, as I said. Odd. Interesting.

The commenters over on IMDB love it. Some are calling it the best show on TV. I have to differ. It’s an interesting show, but the incessant voiceovers are, to say the least, irritating, as are a couple of the characters (the sister, the police captain) and the subplots (the police captain’s crush on Dexter). But it is an intriguing show.


Lost  Is Losing Me

October 28th, 2006 at 7:15 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

We haven’t watched this week’s episode yet — largely because we saw the preview from last week’s episode.

I have a very strong, very negative, visceral reaction to the Others. I get the feeling the writers want me to sympathize with them, even as they murder, kidnap, and treat their captives — major characters in the show — like animals. Something has to happen here. Either Sawyer, Kate, and Jack need to be freed or escape soon, or they need to strike back and kill a few of the Others.

Right now, watching Lost just makes me angry. I don’t like watching shows that make me angry.


Weird Spam

October 27th, 2006 at 4:05 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

I thought the whole point of spam was to drive traffic, usually to some kind of business or scam site. That, I understand; I don’t like it, but I understand it.

What I don’t understand is meaningless spam, with no links in it at all. Just babble. Like this:

“Get wood for fire,” he commanded. The white pithecanthropus skull cloud still, Then she said, «You really understand how the child feels, don’t you.

or this:

It appeared to have been caught on the ground at the spaceport and was held down by a now blackened net of giant vines. In your own way, Temuchin, you are a great man, he thought, Sometimes you can tell a perfect stranger what you would never dare reveal to your most intimate friend.

What’s the point of this? Why expend resources to send it out at all? Are these nuts off their meds? And why do I get fifty-some of these babble spam messages a day?

Oops, dog is climbing up on keyboard. Petting time.


Enough.

October 27th, 2006 at 1:56 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Bomb Gaulladet.


Just So Ya Know

October 27th, 2006 at 1:51 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

There are these creatures in the house called dogs:

And when they’re not napping or eating, they want to be petted. When they want to be petted, they tend to climb up on top of the keyboard, effectively preventing one from blogging. Sometimes they nap on top of the keyboard.

Just so ya know.


King Harry’s Speech

October 27th, 2006 at 12:23 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

I’m not a big fan of Kenneth Branagh’s movies — except for Henry V, one of the greatest films of the last thirty years, and an exemplary performance from Branagh as King Harry. If you’ve never seen it, first watch Harry’s speech before the Battle of Agincourt, then order it from Amazon by clicking the image below.

Henry V

Shakespeare has never been performed so eloquently.


Schadenfreude!

October 27th, 2006 at 11:59 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Courtesy of Hot Air, I found these fascinating CNN polls — not, mind, that I take them any more seriously than any other poll, less, since I see nothing about margin of error, sample size, or anything else, but liberals are so fond of trumpeting about polls I can’t help but get a kick out of polls that demonstrate how out of touch with reality they are.

Do you think George W. Bush has more power than any other president in U.S. history, or don’t you think so?

Has more power
33%
Does not have more power
65%
No opinion
2%

Do you think the Bush administration has gone too far, has been about right or has not gone far enough in restricting people’s civil liberties to fight terrorism?

Too far
39%
About right
34%
Not far enough
25%
No opinion
2%

Did you see that? 59% believe Bush has done about right or not gone far enough.


“I’m Osama bin Laden

October 27th, 2006 at 9:53 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

and I approved this message!”

Hat tip: Bullwinkle Blog


Early Weekend Free Thread

October 27th, 2006 at 7:47 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Technorati:

Comment or trackback, as long as you link to this post.

Trackback URI:
http://rightwingnation.com/2006/10/27/early-weekend-free-thread-17/trackback/

Previous free threads are here.


Is He Running For President?

October 26th, 2006 at 5:23 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Jay Tea fondly remembers NH Governor Meldrim Thomson:

Thomson was a Pennsyvanian who moved to New Hampshire and allied himself with the publisher of our only state-wide newspaper, and rode that friendship into three terms in the governor’s office. “Mel” was a true character.

  • When a Massachusetts driver blew past his state-trooper-driven car, Thomson ordered the trooper to chase and pull over the guy, who not only got a ticket and hefty fine, but lost his privilege to drive in New Hampshire.

  • When Massachusetts had state troopers sit in the parking lot of New Hampshire state liquor stores and copy down the license plates of Bay Staters cheating Massachusetts’ tax on booze, Thomson ordered New Hampshire state troopers to arrest their Massachusetts colleagues for loitering.
  • Thomson, a tireless supporter of states’ rights, pushed repeatedly for the New Hampshire National Guard to be equipped with tactical nuclear weapons.
  • Thomson used his authority to order the states’ flags lowered to half-staff at the drop of a hat. We offiicially mourned the official United States recognition of Communist China, the ejection of Taiwan from the Olympics, the signing of the Panama Canal Treaty, and several other times.
  • When anti-nuclear protesters assembled at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant (then under construction), Thomson put on his “commander in chief of the National Guard” hat and, while wearing military fatigues, flew in a helicopter to the scene and personally ordered the arrest of all 1,400 protesters.
  • Thomson was denied a fourth term in 1978, when Democrat Hugh Gallen finally defeated Governor Mel. But while politics might have been done with Mel Thomson, Thomson wasn’t done with politics. In 1980, disgusted that the leading Republican candidate — Ronald Reagan — was too liberal, he ran a very brief presidential campaign.

Unfortunately, he passed away in 2001, but I found some other gems on Wikipedia (no doubt they were meant to be pejorative, given the left-leaning politics of most Wikipedia authors):

It was during Thomson’s tenure that “Live Free or Die” was placed on New Hampshire’s license plates; it is one of best-known state mottos in the country. Also during his tenure, the state reinstituted the death penalty, which gave Thomson great satisfaction. Thomson also abolished a majority of New Hampshire’s taxes (income, capital gains, sales, etc.).

Then there was this:

Thomson was also responsible for the rise of David Souter. In 1978, Thomson appointed Souter to the Superior Court bench. Twelve years later, Souter became a U.S. Supreme Court justice.

Oh well. You can’t be perfect, I guess.


Headline des Tages

October 26th, 2006 at 2:08 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

from Peter Hitchens: “More bonkers ideas become mainstream.” Other momentous headlines include, “Scientists confirm that water is wet!” and “Studies show that circles are round!”


Hollywood Republican

October 26th, 2006 at 1:50 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

The National Review interviews David Zuckerman:

You know, when I think of Jimmy Carter, I think back on my life to the most shameful things I’ve ever done, and one of the top five has to be voting for Jimmy Carter.


Mass Insanity

October 26th, 2006 at 1:08 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

The Kos Kidz are frothing at the mouth about revolution. Somebody get these moonbats some medication.


Response To Ryan’s Response To Me

October 26th, 2006 at 12:18 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Let’s just start at the beginning and work our way through. Ryan says:

Let me first get my disagreements out of the way.  As can likely be imagined, I say school choice can and certainly does improve educational quality, for the simple reason that clear trends can be seen in research:

Whoa. Here is what I said:

I suspect, however, that if one did a nationwide study of public, charter, and private schools, looking at what happens in the classroom as well as test scores, one would find relatively little variance. Certainly, there are schools that are better than others, but overall, schools are pretty much the same.

Let me clarify, just in case I’m misunderstood again. Sure, you can point to any number of successful charter or private schools — and I can point to just as many unsuccessful, moonbatty charter or private schools. I meant that overall, schools are schools, and even if private (or charter) schools have higher test scores, they aren’t high enough as a group to call them successful.

As pointed out here, seven gold-standard random assignment studies have shown significant test score gains for students who have been able to participate in school choice programs in comparison to their public school counterparts.

Those, as has been pointed out — as you pointed out — are flawed studies for several reasons. Such a study needs to be longitudinal, for one thing, but the objection I immediately had was similar to Coulson’s, that the study controllled for endogenous variables — which leveled the results. Not, mind, that this study is any different from nearly all ed studies I’ve seen, which control for variables purely out of political bias (somebody please give me a well reasoned, scientific argument for controlling for socioeconomic status, please, because I have never seen one, and cannot imagine an acceptable justification for it).

Students who participate in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program are far more likely to graduate from high school.

I’m an empiricist, remember? One example carries no weight with me.

  • Public schools weren’t harmed by school choice; in fact, Milwaukee students who didn’t participate in school choice (i.e. those who remained in public school) were likewise better off.  As of 2002:
    • Milwaukee Public Schools didn’t lose students: enrollment increased by 4,576 students since 1990, the year the program was introduced.
    • MPS market share increased to 80 percent from 78 percent of K-12 Milwaukee
      students.

    • Real spending per pupil increased by 24 percent.
    • State support for MPS – adjusted for inflation – increased 61 percent. 

Uhm, wait. That’s a separate issue, is it not, whether public schools were or were not harmed by school choice? I would ask the same question about whether choice benefits public or private schools, how choice affects parental satisfaction, or whether choice can help protect students from violence.

On to the point: the educration bureaucracy. First, the report on ed schools Ryan cited understates the problem, because it ignores the primary institutional issue that will continue to perpetuate the problem. I mentioned this in another article recently, but I’ll go into it in more detail here.

The biggest joke on any campus is the ed school. Mention the ed school around faculty or even students, and I promise you will get a snicker, and usually a snide remark. Even folklorists — truly a joke themselves — sneer at the ed school. I came out of a department that had a nominally redundant program in the ed school. A lot of students were turned down for the PhD program in our department, and applied at the ed school and were acccepted. The ease with which one can get into a PhD program and complete it in an ed school is far worse than a joke. It is a farce.

The problem here is that academics are far too tolerant of such nonsense. Ask yourself this: If academics sneer at ed schools, why do they allow them on their campuses? If a department does no rigorous academic research, why does it exist at a major research university?

The answer is complex, but can be boiled down to the nature of the academy as an institution and the freedom which it gives faculty to do research, and the tolerance faculty have for idiocy masquerading as academia. As long as the academy remains unchanged — and there’s no reason to believe that it will be changed, at least not in these two crucial ways — ed schools will flourish.

The problem this presents public and private education is that off campus, nobody knows how idiotic these educrats are. People assume that they are authorities of education as they assume doctors are authorities of healing. So the education bureaucracies are stacked with ed school moonbats. Ed school moonbat-dominated education bureaucracies hire ed school moonbats as school administrators. Ed school moonbat school administrators hire ed school moonbat teachers. Ed school moonbat-dominated state education bureaucracies use “teacher certification” (at least this one does) to ensure that only ed school moonbats are hired as teachers. It’s a self-perpetuating cyle, and it even plays out in the justice system, as ed school moonbat-dominated teachers unions target reform-minded candidates, bills, and voter initiatives for defeat.

Hiring a retired Navy officer here and there isn’t going to break the monopoly, because it is pervasive, and dominates all levels of education. The only way I can think of to break the cycle is for states to pass laws prohibiting schools from hiring ed school graduates anywhere in the educational system, and mandating that teachers teach in their major areas of study (English majors teach English and math majors teach math, as opposed to ed school grads with an area specialization in English teaching English and ed school grads with an area specialization in math teaching math).1

Breaking the ed school stranglehold on education is the only way out of this mess.

  1. I know, California does this, but that doesn’t count; the whole state of California is one huge moonbat hatchery, so why would they need ed schools? []

Stop The ACLU Blogburst

October 26th, 2006 at 8:56 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU:


Fair Tax Blogburst

October 26th, 2006 at 8:54 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

With this heated election approaching faster than one could imagine, we thought it would be a time to throw the FT BB into the debates to see where each of our respective candidates reside in these matters.


Belated Wictory Wednesday Blogburst

October 26th, 2006 at 8:50 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

This week Wictory Wednesday presents Jim Talent for re-election to the United States Senate.


591 Years Ago Yesterday

October 26th, 2006 at 7:20 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

In 1415, King Henry V of England defeated King Charles IV of France at the famous Battle of Agincourt. One of Shakespeare’s most memorable passages (and that’s saying a great deal) is Henry’s speech before the battle, from Henry V, one of Shakespeare’s two greatest history plays.

King Henry V

This day is called the feast of Crispian:
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when the day is named,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say “To-morrow is Saint Crispian”:
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars.
And say “These wounds I had on Crispin’s day.”
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot,
But he’ll remember with advantages
What feats he did that day: then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words
Harry the king, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester,
Be in their flowing cups freshly remember’d.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne’er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remember’d;
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition:
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.

And another famous passage from Henry V:

Fluellen

Your majesty says very true: if your majesties is
remembered of it, the Welshmen did good service in a
garden where leeks did grow, wearing leeks in their
Monmouth caps; which, your majesty know, to this
hour is an honourable badge of the service; and I do
believe your majesty takes no scorn to wear the leek
upon Saint Tavy’s day.

King Henry V

I wear it for a memorable honour;
For I am Welsh, you know, good countryman.

Fluellen

All the water in Wye cannot wash your majesty’s
Welsh plood out of your pody, I can tell you that:
God pless it and preserve it, as long as it pleases
his grace, and his majesty too!


Thursday Free Thread

October 26th, 2006 at 6:41 am by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

Technorati:

Comment or trackback, as long as you link to this post.

Trackback URI:
http://rightwingnation.com/2006/10/26/thursday-free-thread-28/trackback/

Previous free threads are here.


Free Jack Idema Blogburst

October 25th, 2006 at 2:24 pm by rightwingprof -- Trackback URL

After the turmoil of recent weeks, the past seven days have been uneventful in the case of illegally-imprisoned Special Forces soldier Jack Idema.

Jack remains holed-up in his compound at Pulacharke prison, still under threat from the men President Karzai has posted outside the prison, but, for the moment, relatively safe.

As for Brent Bennett, Jack’s right-hand man, he remains free since giving his State Department captors the slip en route to back to the U.S. While this is, in itself, good news, it is still unclear precisely what his legal status actually is — As Brent himself wrote in his account of his removal from Afghanistan, “the United States Consul seeks to make me a man without a country to go home to”. Some reward for answering your country’s call to hunt terrorists in a time of war, eh?

While Jack and Brent continue existing in what amounts to a legal limbo, however, President Karzai’s behaviour toward hardened Taliban fighters couldn’t be more different: