Archive for April 4th, 2007

Jeff Goldstein reports:

West Virginia taxpayers may soon be paying for portly citizens to attend Weight Watchers meetings. The state claims it’s spending $100 million a year on obesity-related health care. Now, in an effort to reduce those costs, the state’s largest Medicaid provider—UniCare, a subsidiary of Wellpoint—will pony up for 16 weeks of subsidized Weight Watchers services. Wellpoint intends to establish similar payouts in 14 other states.

Unfortunately, the change in unlikely to help the bottom line. Tennessee tried a similar plan last year and boasted that the 1,400 subsidized participants lost 8000 pounds collectively. That may sound good, but it averages out to a little less than six pounds per person—not enough to make a difference in health care costs or the lives of the obese people the plan is supposed to help.

This isn’t the first time West Virginia has dipped into the state coffers to encourage dieting. In 2003 it erected billboards proclaiming “Biggie Fries = Biggie Thighs.” No statewide reductions in thigh circumference have been reported.

And Radley Balko quite correctly says:

Where, exactly, is the problem, here? Seems to me that people are making their own decisions about diet and health, and paying for the consequences of those decisions.

He doesn’t get it. Obesity is a PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS! (at least on the days when the health-related Chicken Littlism isn’t POOR PEOPLE STARVING AND EATING OUT OF GARBAGE CANS! It’s liberalism. It’s all about having an elite tell us what we may and may not do. That’s all liberalism is about, and all it has ever been about. Not civil rights. Not freedom. Just control.

But the point, of course, is that again, we have millions and millions of dollars pumped into a government program that produces no results–and as Jeffrey Quick points out, we have another here:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The early onset of Daylight Savings Time in the United States this year may have been for naught.

The move to turn the clocks forward by an hour on March 11 rather than the usual early April date was mandated by the U.S. government as an energy-saving effort.

But other than forcing millions of drowsy American workers and school children into the dark, wintry weather three weeks early, the move appears to have had little impact on power usage.

“We haven’t seen any measurable impact,” said Jason Cuevas, spokesman for Southern Co., one of the nation’s largest power companies, echoing comments from several large utilities.

You don’t say. But no doubt it made the legislators and bureaucrats who supported the DST pushback feel good about themselves.

Idiots.

No!

Read the whole thing (with links to the report):

. . . none of these criminals who attacked police officers was “hindered by any law–federal, sate or local–that has ever been established to prevent gun ownership. They just laughed at gun laws.” The newsletter also stated, “In contrast to media myth, none of the firearms in the study was obtained from gun shows.”

Wait. You mean criminals don’t obey the law? Don’t they know it’s for the common good? Don’t they understand that it’s to stop the cycle of violence so we can all sing kumbayah and be told what we can and cannot do? And aren’t gun shows where all those evil neo-Nazi theocrat thugs sell guns illegally to murder minorities and murder abortion doctors? My head hurts!

Okay, this is bad enough:

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (AP) — Five fifth-grade students face criminal charges after authorities said four of them had sex in front of other students in an unsupervised classroom and kept a classmate posted as a lookout for teachers.

The students were arrested Tuesday at the Spearsville school in rural north Louisiana, authorities said. Two 11-year-old girls, a 12-year-old boy and a 13-year old boy were charged with obscenity, a felony. An 11-year-old boy, the alleged lookout, was charged with being an accessory.

“After 44 years of doing this work, nothing shocks me anymore,” said Union Parish Sheriff Bob Buckley. “But this comes pretty close.”

Authorities said the incident happened March 27 at the school, which houses students from kindergarten through 12th grade. A high school teacher normally watches the fifth-grade class at the time, but went to an assembly for older students and the class was inadvertently left unattended, Buckley said.

And God forbid I might seem to be defending indefensible behavior, but as my grandfather would have said, now wait just a minute.

A teacher for whatever reason was not in the classroom and the unsupervised fifth-graders–ranging from 11 to 13 years old–decided to have an orgy in the classroom the teacher couldn’t be bothered to supervise, but instead of the teacher, the fifth-graders were arrested?

What’s wrong with this picture?

From CNN:

SEATTLE, Washington (AP) — A University of Washington researcher was shot to death in her office Monday morning by a former boyfriend who then turned the gun on himself, police said.

Officers responding to reports of gunfire found the two dead in an office on the fourth floor of Gould Hall, the university’s architecture building, Assistant University Police Chief Ray Wittmier said.

The 26-year-old woman was granted a restraining order last month against Jonathan Rowan, according to court documents. University police said he was not affiliated with the school.

“I cannot find him but he can find me (knows my place of work),” the victim, identified by colleagues as Rebecca Griego, wrote in a restraining order petition filed against Rowan on March 6 in King County Superior Court.

About six shots were fired, and a handgun was found in the room. There were no eyewitnesses, and no one else was harmed, Wittmier said.

Lance Nguyen, who worked with Griego at the Runstad Center for Real Estate Research, said the victim had become increasingly worried about her former boyfriend in recent weeks.

“She said it’s a psycho from her past,” Nguyen said.

In the restraining order petition, Griego wrote that Rowan had threatened her and her sister, and said he had threatened suicide “because he couldn’t see me.”

Campus police were not aware of the restraining order, Wittmier said. He also said he did not think the man had permission to carry a handgun on campus, where firearms are banned.

How’s that “gun-free zone” policy working for you out there? Not only did the stalker violate it, but once again, gun control claims another victim: The murdered woman who might have defended herself, had she been armed.

Oh, but I forgot the headline, just as clueless:

Police: Slain woman had restraining order

And a restraining order is supposed to do . . . what, exactly?

Idiots.

Carnival of Education is up!

Going to see Hal Holbrook do his show Mark Twain Tonight. I didn’t sleep very well last night; I’d better hop up on espressos this afternoon.

Technorati:

Comment or trackback, as long as you link to here.