Matt Johnson posted an article discussing the pay gap between men and women, and cites this Washington Post article:

But unless today’s women make some changes, that’s exactly what may happen. This goes beyond that conventional salary-disparity culprit, workplace discrimination, that was the subject of a Supreme Court ruling last week. If Funk and her female classmates don’t prosper as much as their male colleagues do, it will probably be because they didn’t dream rich enough dreams in choosing their major.

As they head into the working world, most of this year’s female college grads will never be equal to their male colleagues again. Last month, the American Association of University Women reported that in the first year after graduating, women working full-time make 20 percent less on average than their male classmates.

That’s certainly the fate of one young graduate from Tulane University. Laden with honors and boasting killer GRE scores, she is hoping to get hired as an intern in psychology, at a salary of about $30,000 a year. Her more business-oriented classmates — mostly male, as she recalls — are already making more than twice that.

[ . . . ]

In fact, what the AAUW report reveals is that, at almost every step of the way, women could make decisions that would keep them even with their male classmates. But they don’t.

The biggest decision any student keeping an eye on the bottom line can make is the choice of a major. According to the AAUW report, women who major in education make 60 percent of what female engineers make in their first year of work. But far more women still choose education over engineering.

[ . . . ]

Even within the same major, students can prepare for the jobs that pay better, if they care to. Teaching math (which many women choose) pays less than working for a computer company or going into business. And there is the choice of employer. Even when men and women pick the same majors and go into the same fields, the woman who chooses local government or nonprofit sectors starts out at a lower pay level than the guy sporting the next mortarboard who decides to get into the market economy or take a federal job. Liz Funk, to her credit, has already figured out that she’d be better off working as a staff writer at a magazine, earning benefits, than trying to make it out of college as a freelancer. But she’s an exception.

The situation in the first year out of college is bad enough, but the decisions women make in college set in motion a process that will accelerate until, 10 years after graduating, they are making only 69 percent of what men make. That’s because, if women earn less from the outset, it’s an easy choice as to who will bear the responsibility for child care and housekeeping when the time comes to start a family.

So according to this AAUW report, it’s not only the choice of major, but also the choice of employment. And at least one high achieving student apparently never considered salary:

By contrast, the Tulane psych major was surprised to learn what bankers earn 10 years out. “I guess I’ll end up making a lot less than half,” she concluded, laughing nervously. “It’s okay. It is what it is.”

As it happens, I had downloaded the degrees awarded in 2003-2004 data from NCES. I hadn’t seen the Post story nor Matt’s article. I was curious largely because of all the whining about "pay inequity" we’ve been hearing lately. So let’s look at the data and see if the data support the thesis of this Washington Post article (and AAUW report).

First, let’s see how degrees were awarded nationally by sex in 2003-2004:

Degree
Male
Female
Bachelor’s 42.54% 57.46%
Master’s 41.07% 58.93%
Doctorate 52.34% 47.66%

And here’s the chart:

So women were awarded more bachelor’s and master’s degrees than men. The only degree awarded to more men than women was the doctorate. Whether this means women are more successful university students is another matter; we’d have to check the degree stats against matriculation stats, and see whether men or women have a higher degree completion rate. However, these data do show that women are in no way "disadvantaged" by American universities.

But what about the fields men and women choose? Is there a significant difference, as the Post article and AAUW report claims? First, let’s look at the most popular fields for all three degrees. Here is the top quintile for all three degrees, for both sexes:

Field of study
Bachelor’s
%-age
Business 613,772 34.01%
Communications/Journalism 175,896 9.75%
Social sciences and history 150,357 8.33%
Education 106,278 5.89%
English 94,311 5.23%
 
Master’s:
%-age
Business 278,691 39.72%
Education 162,345 23.14%
Health professions and related clinical sciences 44,939 6.40%
Engineering and engineering technologies 35,197 5.02%
Public administration and social service professions 28,250 4.03%
 
Doctorates:
%-age
Education 7,088 14.15%
Engineering and engineering technologies 5,981 11.94%
Biological and biomedical sciences 5,242 10.47%
Psychology 4,827 9.64%
Health professions and related clinical sciences 4,361 8.71%

Business, unsurprisingly, is the most popular field for the bachelor’s and master’s degrees. Also unsurprisingly, it is not a popular doctorate (the only reason to do a doctorate in business is to go into academia, presumably at a business school, and most people do business degrees because they want to work in the private sector). Whereas education is the fourth most popular bachelor’s field, it is behind only business at the master’s level–again, unsurprising, since many states require teachers to complete master’s degrees in education.

Before I continue, let me define a pragmatic field. A pragmatic field is one whose purpose is to prepare the student for gainful employment after graduation. Note the top quintile for bachelor’s degrees. What is surprising is that only two of the five fields (business and education) are pragmatic. (Since communications/journalism includes many fields, only one of which is journalism, and the rest non-pragmatic, I am not including it as a pragmatic field here.) This calls into question the frequently-heard complaint on your favorite university campus that students view education too pragmatically.

Note that all of the master’s level fields are pragmatic. (I suspect that many master’s program students are doing pragmatic degrees because they did worthless bachelor’s degrees).

When we look at the data aggregated by sex, however, we see a more revealing pattern. First, let’s look at the most popular bachelor’s fields (top quintile) for men and women:

Male:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Business 613,772 304,775 308,997 -0.69%
Social sciences and history 150,357 73,834 76,523 -1.79%
Engineering and engineering technologies 78,227 63,502 14,725 62.35%
Communications/Journalism 175,896 61,082 114,814 -30.55%
Computer and information sciences 59,488 44,585 14,903 49.90%
Female:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Business 613,772 304,775 308,997 -0.69%
Communications/Journalism 175,896 61,082 114,814 -30.55%
Education 106,278 22,802 83,476 -57.09%
Social sciences and history 150,357 73,834 76,523 -1.79%
English 94,311 28,903 65,408 -38.71%

Business is the most popular bachelor’s among both men and women (in fact, women get more bachelor’s degrees in business than men by 0.69%). I don’t find this surprising. We’ve seen more women in our classes every semester for years. Social sciences/history and communication/journalism appear in the top quintile for both sexes. Engineering and engineering technologies is the third most-popular bachelor’s field for men, but does not appear in the top quintile for women, and men get more bachelor’s degrees in engineering than women by 62.35%. Computer and information sciences is the fifth most popular field for men, but does not appear in the top quintile for women. Other than business, engineering and computer sciences are two of the highest paying fields in the job market.

Instead, women are getting bachelor’s degrees in education and English. Education is a pragamatic field, but not a well-paying one, compared to either engineering or computer sciences (as I’m sure educators will agree). English is not a pragmatic degree.

If we look at the top quintiles for both sexes in terms of proportion, that is, what fields do men overwhelmingly dominate, and vice versa, the data are even more interesting:

Disproportionately male:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Engineering and engineering technologies 78,227 63,502 14,725 62.35%
Computer and information sciences 59,488 44,585 14,903 49.90%
Philosophy and religious studies 11,152 7,046 4,106 26.36%
History 29,808 17,403 12,405 16.77%
Physical sciences and science technologies 17,983 10,476 7,507 16.51%
Disproportionately female:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Health professions and related clinical sciences 73,934 10,017 63,917 -72.90%
Public administration and social service professions 20,552 3,793 16,759 -63.09%
Education 106,278 22,802 83,476 -57.09%
Psychology 82,098 18,193 63,905 -55.68%
Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics 17,754 5,215 12,539 -41.25%

Three of the five fields that are disproportionately male are high-paying pragmatic fields. Three of the five fields that are disproportionately female are pragmatic fields (health professions, public administration, and education), but with significantly lower salaries (at the bachelor’s level) than the former three fields. The patterns are somewhat different at the master’s level:

Male:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Business 278,691 161,714 116,977 16.05%
Education 162,345 37,843 124,502 -53.38%
Engineering and engineering technologies 35,197 27,667 7,530 57.21%
Computer and information sciences and support services 20,143 13,868 6,275 37.70%
Health professions and related clinical sciences 44,939 9,670 35,269 -56.96%
Female:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Education 162,345 37,843 124,502 -53.38%
Business 278,691 161,714 116,977 16.05%
Health professions and related clinical sciences 44,939 9,670 35,269 -56.96%
Public administration and social service professions 28,250 7,001 21,249 -50.44%
Psychology 17,898 3,789 14,109 -57.66%

The most popular master’s level field for men was business. We see men choosing to get a degree in order to get a high paying job. The second most popular is education, and as I said above, this is not surprising, since many states require teachers to get master’s degrees in education. The remaining three fields in the top quintile for men lead to high paying jobs.

A great many women are getting MBAs, and also master’s degrees in health professions. These women are going for high salaries. But two of the fields in the top quintile, psychology and public adminstration, are notably less lucrative at the master’s level. When we look at the fields that are disproportionately represented by the sexes, as we did above, the data are even more interesting:

Disproportionately male:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Engineering and engineering technologies 35,197 27,667 7,530 57.21%
Computer and information sciences 20,143 13,868 6,275 37.70%
Philosophy and religious studies 1,578 972 606 23.19%
Physical sciences and science technologies 5,570 3,364 2,206 20.79%
Business 278,691 161,714 116,977 16.05%
Disproportionately female:
Field of study
Total
Males
Females
∆ (M-F)
Library science 6,015 1,151 4,864 -61.73%
Psychology 17,898 3,789 14,109 -57.66%
Health professions and related clinical sciences 44,939 9,670 35,269 -56.96%
Education 162,345 37,843 124,502 -53.38%
Public administration and social service professions 28,250 7,001 21,249 -50.44%

In the heavily male dominated fields, four of the five lead to high paying jobs. In the heavily female dominated fields, only one (health professions) leads to high salaries.

These Department of Education data support the same conclusions drawn by the Post article and the AAUW study. Whereas more women are getting degrees that will get them high paying jobs, men still show more interest in the fields of study that will get them high salaries than are women. To draw a crude generalization, men approach higher education more pragmatically than do women. The inevitable result, of course, is a so-called "pay inequity" between the sexes.

One thing, by the way, I find quite interesting: Why do men dominate so heavily in philosophy and religious studies degrees?

7 Comments

  1. weaver says:

    it does seem pretty clear that women are making decisions about majors and careers based on priorities other than money, while men are making money a higher priority when they decide on majors and careers. it’s tempting to speculate on why, but i won’t.

  2. skh.pcola says:

    Beautiful post, RWP. I’m going to end up using it as a reference often in the wage differential debate, fo’ sho’.

  3. George says:

    This is a very interesting post. Thanks for summarizing this info.

    (As an aside, I don’t think “quintile” means what you seem to think it means. “Top quintile” means the top fifth, not the top five.)

  4. rightwingprof says:

    George on June 7, 2007 at 12:01 am said:

    This is a very interesting post. Thanks for summarizing this info.

    (As an aside, I don’t think “quintile” means what you seem to think it means. “Top quintile” means the top fifth, not the top five.)

    I realize that. There were 25 areas in the data. Therefore, the top five were the top quintile.

  5. Dan says:

    I just got my MA in philosophy last year and my program was also male-dominated (for both grad students and professors). The ratio was typical of most schools. Don’t mistake American academic philosophy for some touchy-feely, New Age, nurturing, purely interpretative subject. It’s hard-nosed, highly analytic, and logic-focused; all very left-brain stuff that tends to appeal more to males, though the women in the program, of course, excelled at what they did.

    I had a couple of classes with a few students from other disciplines, e.g. English and Anthropology, and they had a… well… less rigorous argumentative approach than we did. They didn’t think like we did and, true to their training, were more interested in applying theory as opposed to analyzing the theory itself.

  6. Ivory says:

    Two comments - 1) Allied Health students make quite a bit of money these days, more than business majors straight out of school. In my state, starting salaries are in the 60-70K range, even if the field only requires an AA degree. 2) The complaints about pay inequity are usually that women get paid less than men for doing equivalent work. This may be because of discrimination or it may be because of the choices women make about family and caretaking. Either way, I think it’s interesting to think about why professions women gravitate towards pay so poorly and why we penalize people (men and women) to decide to take care of their families.

  7. rightwingprof says:

    Ivory on June 11, 2007 at 12:39 pm said:

    1) Allied Health students make quite a bit of money these days, more than business majors straight out of school. In my state, starting salaries are in the 60-70K range, even if the field only requires an AA degree.

    First, I don’t know what an “Allied Health” student is, and I’d certainly like to see figures to back up your claim–after, of course, you define what an “Allied Health” student is. And of course, what you get paid with a business degree depends entirely on your major (accounting, operations, etc.) and where you apply for a job.

    The complaints about pay inequity are usually that women get paid less than men for doing equivalent work.

    Actually, the complaints about pay inequity are based on the faulty assumption of “equivalent work,” which does not exist. Pay inequity exists when men and women are paid differently for the same job. Other than the same job, there is no such thing as “equivalent work.” Pay inequity does not exist when a female school teacher is not paid as much as a male engineer.

    why we penalize people (men and women) to decide to take care of their families.

    Well, “we” don’t, because “we” have nothing to do directly with who gets paid what. Supply and demand determines that.