This entry was posted on Monday, April 28th, 2008 at 12:18 pm and is filed under Odds 'n Ends.You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Imagine the Supreme Court requiring a voter to show ID to combat voter fraud. Why you would think that they wanted fair and honest elections. What’s the world coming to. The Dems can’t have their illegal alien supporters vote illegally for them. What a shame.
interestingly, but not surprisingly, the media here in indiana has focussed on the ’splintered’ decision, the ’split’ decision, ‘no single majority opinion’ making it sound like there was a lot of disagreement on the issue in SCOTUS.
wrong. 6 - 3 is a clear majority and the opinions were really interesting. on the right there was the ‘yes, this law is constitutional’ and ‘hell yes! this law is constitutional’. on the left there was, ‘we don’t like it but it doesn’t target any group, but we don’t like it, what about the POOR?? the ELDERLY??’ and ‘but there hasn’t been any voter fraud so why do you have to protect against it?’
since indiana provides a FREE photo ID to whoever will show up with the papers to get one, i find the poor/elderly argument ridiculous. the poor and elderly i know are smart enough to get to the office and get IDs. which poor and elderly are they concerned about?
their final argument made me laugh out loud. so we’re supposed to lock the barn AFTER the horse is stolen? gimme a break.
Mitch H.: How could you have known she would be there? Nobody to my knowledge knew for a fact that she’d do...
Mitch H.: I thought Johnstown was either Murtha’s district or Shuster’s? Peterson’s is mostly north...
PhilMB: Damnit John — clobber that Communist tool !! I admit I do not like McCain’s attitude of...
eric: RWN, It’s a shame you had to run errands today. I got mine done yesterday so I could watch some thrilling...
Anna: Thank you for the post. This election is turning me into a manic-depressive. When I read some blogs, I get...
Recent Trackbacks
Right Wing Nation » Wowza: thunk? I mean, really. This is right up there in the same Twilight Zone episode category as the NRA ad beginning with “Hillary was
Right Wing Nation » See? Just Ask Me.: said Obama was too pompous and impressed with himself to apologize. And after Obama stuck his great big foot all the way down his gullet the other day,
Right Wing Nation » That's That: “Eh, not so much” becomes “Hell, no.” Although she is 60 and unlikely to have another shot at the White House, Clinton is apparently concerned that she would appear ungenerous to the Republicans’ first female vice-presidential candidate if she were to go after her.
Imagine the Supreme Court requiring a voter to show ID to combat voter fraud. Why you would think that they wanted fair and honest elections. What’s the world coming to. The Dems can’t have their illegal alien supporters vote illegally for them. What a shame.
interestingly, but not surprisingly, the media here in indiana has focussed on the ’splintered’ decision, the ’split’ decision, ‘no single majority opinion’ making it sound like there was a lot of disagreement on the issue in SCOTUS.
wrong. 6 - 3 is a clear majority and the opinions were really interesting. on the right there was the ‘yes, this law is constitutional’ and ‘hell yes! this law is constitutional’. on the left there was, ‘we don’t like it but it doesn’t target any group, but we don’t like it, what about the POOR?? the ELDERLY??’ and ‘but there hasn’t been any voter fraud so why do you have to protect against it?’
since indiana provides a FREE photo ID to whoever will show up with the papers to get one, i find the poor/elderly argument ridiculous. the poor and elderly i know are smart enough to get to the office and get IDs. which poor and elderly are they concerned about?
their final argument made me laugh out loud. so we’re supposed to lock the barn AFTER the horse is stolen? gimme a break.