St00pid, St00pid, St00pid!
I don’t read the Philly media — I figure it would raise my blood pressure too much — but Sebastian links to an article that is, perhaps, the most idiotic thing I have read — and just so you don’t miss the wailing and hand wringing, this moronic drivel is entitled — and I do quote — “How many must die before gun lobby gets message?” Christ, it sounds like a Peter, Paul, and Mary song already, doesn’t it? Anyway, it starts fine:
The city reels from the murder of Sgt. Stephen Liczbin-ski, and in the midst of it, there are more blows to our sensibilities:
But immediately she doesn’t put her finger on the problem, she is the problem:
There’s the sickening eruption of what looked like gratuitous violence when police arrested three men driving away from the scene of another shooting - beating them and kicking them unmercifully, over and over, in a tableau of unchecked rage.
Woe! Woe is us! A cop killer, why that’s awful, but not nearly as awful as the police subduing a scumbag criminal! Oh no! Oh dear! Whatever shall we do? These poor, oppressed, disadvantaged criminals!
Then she starts on guns, because she’s entirely too st00pid to know that criminals are the problem, not guns:
There’s the continuing mindlessness of the gun lobby’s argument that weapons such as the SKS that killed Liczbinski should be available to one and all, as if only Second Amendment rights should be impervious to modification - unlike all the other rights we have.
And it goes downhill from there.
So idiot, re-read your first two paragraphs, and tell me: Are you really so incredibly st00pid that you don’t see the contradiction between the two?
Look, idiot, here in central Pennsylvania, we have lots and lots of guns, and very little crime, absolutely none compared to you. Why is that? Don’t try to answer: That’s what is known as a rhetorical question.
Here’s why. We. Don’t. Tolerate. Crimimals.
You worship criminals. You bow and scrape at the mere mention of Mumia’s name. You elect liberals who accommodate criminals at every opportunity, letting them go free on minimal bail or OR, putting them in halfway houses, slapping them on the wrists, and sending them to group therapy. And what do they do? Why, they commit more crime as soon as they get the opportunity, and they will continue to do so as long as you elect morons who put them back out on the street.
Here, you see, we lock criminals up in prison, for a long time. We just convicted a guy of a string of robberies with a toy gun. Nobody was hurt. It didn’t make a damned bit of difference. We gave him more years in prison than you’ve probably given every criminal sentenced in the last week in Philadelphia. We don’t moan about all those poor, oppressed minorities in prison, because we don’t care if they’re white, black, orange, or polka-dotted. They’re criminals. Do the crime, do the time. Here, they’re not set free so they can further terrorize us.
Here’s another reason, idiot. Philly is full of those “sophisticated, cosmopolitan” liberals like you, and their unarmed homes. This part of the state is not, and homes are more likely to be armed than not. Criminals who break into houses here may get shot, and they know it. And guess what? Not the prosecutor, not the sheriff, not the police, nobody would wring their hands and moan if a criminal did get shot, and no charges would be brought.
Now, when you stop moaning about those awful police and those poor, disenfranchised criminals, and stop electing liberals who moan about those awful police and those poor, disenfranchised criminals, then you can complain about criminals. But as long as you accommodate criminals and whine about the police, shut up and suck it up, because you deserve all the murders and rapes and robberies you get. Every. Bit.
And that’s about as nicely as I can put it.
You want my solution to urban crime? Surround high-crime neighborhoods with barbed wire fences, and let them kill each other until they decide to act like civilized human beings. No police. That’s what they want, after all, since they love the criminals and hate the police, so give them what they want.
That would solve the problem.
And as for all of you Radley Balko fanclub idiots who whine about SWAT teams, if you don’t want to live in a war zone. move. And if you decide not to move, shut up and suck it up. If they ever implement my plan for dealing with high crime neighborhoods, we’ll lock you up inside the barbed wire. Think of it as a gift. You won’t have police to whine about any more. Then if you don’t get killed, maybe you’ll develop the smarts to figure out what the real problem is.
Grumpy, me? Naw!
rightwingprof :: May.08.2008 :: Idjits, Wackjobs :: 6 Comments »

[…] Rightwingprof, talking to Jill Porter who you might remember from two days ago: Look, idiot, here in central Pennsylvania, we have lots […]
Don’t they see the connection between gun grabbing and crime? Last I checked the harder it is to get a gun legally, the higher the crime rate. And I’d be willing to bet that many of those cities are sanctuary cities which only exacerbates the situation.
Way to go guys… way to go…
Friday Morning Links…
Why do men die first? Mr. Free MarketOne reason many on the Left do not believe in JihadBasic questions about farm subsidiesThe Maoist insurgency in India"Come over here and fertilize me." Flowers wave at passing bugs.Loving violent criminals…
As one of those “Radley Balko fanclub idiots”, I have no problem with SWAT teams against REAL criminals (not “heroes of American capitalism”) based on REAL evidence (so they don’t shoot 92 year old women). But I’d hate to see one pull a no-knock on a certain armed household in State College PA, just because an informant thought you were on drugs when you wrote that.
[…] I grossly underestimated what a shameful excuse for a justice system Philadelphia has. Sebastian has dug up the criminal records on the three cop killers: Michael Cain was the trigger man in the Liczbinski murder. You can see his fifteen page criminal record here. Let’s look at all the violations of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act that Cain has been arrested for. Keep in mind we’re only looking at gun charges, since that is what this blog concentrates on. Over Cain’s criminal career he had thirteen arrests for unlawfully carrying a firearm, that were listed “Nolle Prossed,†meaning the prosecutor chose not to bring charges. In a further eleven arrests for violations of Pennsylvania’s firearms laws, the charges were either withdrawn or dismissed. In only three cases was he prosecuted and either plead guilty or was found guilty. […]
[…] - RightWingProf […]